Skip to content
NorthPine: Upper Midwest Broadcasting
Menu
  • REGIONS
    • Iowa
    • Manitoba
    • Michigan’s UP
    • Minnesota
      • Twin Cities
    • Nebraska
    • North Dakota
    • NW Ontario
    • South Dakota
    • Wisconsin
  • FEATURES
    • Ask NorthPine
    • Data
    • FCC Monitor
    • History
    • Newsroom Notes
    • Off Topic
    • Weekly Log
  • TOPICS
    • Affiliation changes
    • DTV subchannels
    • Format changes
    • New stations
    • People
    • Public Media
    • Retransmission Consent
    • Station sales
  • Radio Stations
    • Iowa
    • Manitoba
    • Michigan’s UP
    • Minnesota
    • Nebraska
    • North Dakota
    • NW Ontario
    • South Dakota
    • Wisconsin
  • TV Markets
    • Iowa
    • Michigan’s UP
    • Minnesota
    • Nebraska
    • North Dakota
    • South Dakota
    • Wisconsin
  • See Also
    • Other Media Coverage
    • All-Christmas Stations
    • More Info
    • FCCdata.org
    • Radio-Locator
    • FCC LMS
    • RadioInsight
    • Radio/DX Info from Wis.
    • DX-midAMerica
    • TVNewsCheck
    • Broadcasting & Cable
  • About
  • Tip Jar
Menu

Ask NorthPine: Why Are Some Twin Cities Stations Weak in Wisconsin?

Posted on July 20, 2022 by Jon Ellis

Is there a reason why all the Minneapolis-St. Paul stations are really weak in Burnett County (Wisconsin) except 107.9? I normally get the others no problem.

The changes you’ve noticed this summer may be due to work at the KMSP(TV) tower in Shoreview, which is also home to ten FM stations.

Twin Cities Public Television, which also uses the tower, has noted that a guy wire replacement project requires TPT’s stations to shut down on about 21 days this summer. The project should be about halfway done by now, according to the original plan, with an estimated completion date of August 15.

The ten FM stations that transmit from the tower (92.5, 93.7, 97.1, 98.5, 99.5, 100.3, 101.3, 102.1, 102.9, and 104.1) all have licensed auxiliary facilities that allow them to transmit from other sites when work is going on at the Shoreview tower. It appears most or all of the auxiliary facilities are at the IDS Center using around 32kW, as compared with the usual 100kW.

While it doesn’t appear the radio stations have made any public announcements about this work, such announcements may be confusing to listeners since most people in the Twin Cities would not notice much difference. But listeners outside of the metro, such as those in the cabin country of Burnett County, Wisconsin, would notice the weaker signals.

KQQL/107.9 transmits from a tower in Anoka County, which gives it a stronger signal to northerly locations such as Burnett County.

Incidentally, Burnett County poses an interesting scenario for radio reception. Though the area can receive dozens of fringe FM signals from several adjacent metro areas, there are only a few local city-grade signals. This makes the area somewhat of a laboratory for demonstration of troposphere-enhanced reception. On a warm summer day, the area may have strong signals booming in on almost every frequency, while reception is a lot more difficult under normal circumstances.

1 thought on “Ask NorthPine: Why Are Some Twin Cities Stations Weak in Wisconsin?”

  1. Pingback: Ask NorthPine: Twin Cities HD Radio Outages – NorthPine: Upper Midwest Broadcasting

Comments are closed.

Latest Posts

  • Contemporary Christian Format Expands in Southwestern Minn.
  • Another “Jett” Lands in Nebraska: McCook Station Changes Format
  • FCC Monitor: Two LPTV’s Granted Moves to Minneapolis
  • Weekly Log: Longtime Minneapolis Meteorologist Retires
  • Big Omaha AM Signal Goes Silent
  • Civic Parts Ways with More Hosts, Adds Syndicated Shows
  • FCC Monitor: Another Request to Review Iowa LPFM Denial
  • Weekly Log: “myTalk” Parts Ways with Longtime Host
  • FCC Monitor: MPR’s KSJR-FM at Reduced Power
  • Weekly Log: Radio Vet Joins Big Radio; WPR, MPR Hosts Retire

Search FCC Database




1996-2018 news archive Facebook logo
©2026 NorthPine: Upper Midwest Broadcasting | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme